Here’s a bold statement: The UFC’s decision to remove Shavkat Rakhmonov from the welterweight rankings has sparked a debate that’s as intense as a championship fight. But here’s where it gets controversial: Kamaru Usman, the former welterweight kingpin, isn’t holding back his thoughts on the matter. And this is the part most people miss—it’s not just about rankings; it’s about consistency, fairness, and the human stories behind these athletes.
On February 5, 2026, the UFC announced that Shavkat Rakhmonov (19-0 MMA, 7-0 UFC) would no longer be part of the 170-pound rankings. The reason? A re-injured knee that required surgery, sidelining him for at least nine months. Rakhmonov’s last fight was a victory over Ian Machado Garry at UFC 310 in December 2024, and since then, he’s been battling injuries rather than opponents. This removal technically benefits Usman, who’s eyeing a return to the welterweight throne, but he’s not celebrating. Instead, he’s questioning the UFC’s criteria for ranking fighters.
Here’s the kicker: Usman points out the double standard in how fighters are treated. On his Pound 4 Pound podcast with Henry Cejudo, he referenced Jon Jones, who remained in the rankings for nearly two years despite inactivity. ‘I’m not disputing Jon’s case,’ Usman said, ‘but are we picking and choosing when someone stays in the rankings?’ It’s a fair question that invites a deeper discussion about the UFC’s policies and whether they’re applied consistently.
Usman, no stranger to injuries himself, empathizes with Rakhmonov’s struggles. After his own comeback victory against Joaquin Buckley in June, Usman understands the physical and mental toll of recovery. He even offered Rakhmonov advice: ‘If you still want to be a champion, consider a new training camp. Your body needs to be a priority until you’re done with this sport.’ Usman suggests Rakhmonov move away from Kazakhstan for a safer training environment, noting that his current setup might be contributing to recurring injuries.
And here’s the thought-provoking part: Is the UFC doing enough to support fighters’ long-term health? Or are rankings and profitability taking precedence? Usman’s comments aren’t just about Rakhmonov’s removal—they’re a call to examine the bigger picture. Should fighters be penalized for injuries beyond their control? And if so, where do we draw the line?
This situation raises more questions than answers, and that’s exactly why it’s worth discussing. What do you think? Is the UFC’s decision fair, or is there a deeper issue at play? Let’s keep the conversation going in the comments—because in the world of MMA, every opinion counts.
